Your rankings do not match your content.
You publish good work and it underperforms. Often the cause is not the content, it is crawlability, site architecture, or technical signals quietly holding it back.
Get Found · Technical SEO
Good content does not rank if crawlers cannot reach it, search engines cannot parse it, or the architecture works against you. Technical SEO is the engineering layer underneath everything else, and it is where most sites quietly lose ground.
When this makes sense
You publish good work and it underperforms. Often the cause is not the content, it is crawlability, site architecture, or technical signals quietly holding it back.
Any structural change is where rankings get won or lost. Getting the technical foundation right before launch is far cheaper than recovering traffic after.
Your current setup got you this far, but no one has actually looked under the hood at crawl paths, indexation, structured data, and internal linking as a system.
Technical SEO is mostly a one-time engineering investment: fix the foundation once and it keeps paying off, instead of the same issues resurfacing every few months.
What gets done
How engagements work
I read the actual signals: crawl data, Search Console, structured data, architecture, and Core Web Vitals, rather than running one tool and forwarding the output. You get a prioritized findings report.
I implement the priority fixes at the source, so one change corrects every page it touches instead of patching pages one at a time.
We confirm the fixes in the wild: re-crawl, re-validate, and baseline the metrics so the improvement is measured, not assumed.
Selected work
Details anonymized; specifics available under NDA.
Legacy Modernization
Replaced a broken Gutenberg-heavy enterprise build with ACF Flex content models, fixed SEO and accessibility at the architecture level, and gave the internal team a backend they could actually use. The frontend stayed pixel-identical so external traffic and inbound links saw no change — all the upgrades happened underneath.
Read the case study
Platform Architecture
A local barbershop expanded to a second location with the same business name. Google was confusing the two locations and consolidating SEO authority incorrectly. We deployed advanced location schema so each location had its own entity, address, business profile, and search presence.
Read the case study
Common questions
On-page SEO is about what’s on the page: copy, keywords, topics. Technical SEO is the engineering layer underneath: whether search engines can crawl, render, and index your pages, how the site is architected, how fast it loads, and what structured data it exposes. Strong content can’t rank if the technical foundation is working against it.
A tool gives you a score and a generic checklist. An audit reads the actual signals: crawl data, Search Console, structured data, architecture, and Core Web Vitals, then tells you which issues are real, which are systemic (one template breaking every page that uses it), and what order to fix them in. The deliverable is a prioritized plan, not a number.
It removes the technical barriers holding your content back, and on a site with real issues that often produces meaningful gains. But it’s a foundation, not a magic lever: it works alongside good content. Think of it as clearing the obstacles between your content and the rankings it should already be earning.
Mostly one-time. Technical SEO is largely an engineering investment: fix the architecture, crawlability, and structured data once and it pays off for years. Ongoing needs are light, mostly monitoring after major changes, migrations, or platform updates.
Any site, and inherited ones especially. The audit and fixes work at the architecture and template level regardless of who built it or what it runs on. Inherited sites are usually where the highest-impact technical issues are hiding.
It plays to my strength. WordPress is where my expertise runs deepest, so I move faster and am especially adept at catching platform-specific issues: autoloaded-option bloat, plugin query overhead, theme-level markup problems. The fundamentals of technical SEO are identical on every platform, so non-WordPress sites get the same rigor; WordPress sites just benefit from that extra layer of depth.
Recent thinking
Core Web Vitals are real, they are a genuine Google ranking signal, and they are almost universally misunderstood. The typical pattern: someone runs a Lighthouse...
Read the article
Internal links are the most underused ranking lever on most WordPress sites. They are the one SEO factor you control completely: no outreach, no waiting...
Read the article
Most SEO advice starts at the end of the story: keywords, content, links, rankings. But ranking is the last step in a chain, and the...
Read the articleA technical SEO audit is a fixed-scope engagement with a prioritized, handoff-ready report. WordPress is where my expertise runs deepest, but the work is platform-agnostic: Shopify, custom, and headless included. Let us talk about your site.
Start a conversation